- #California anti gridlock law driver#
- #California anti gridlock law code#
- #California anti gridlock law license#
#California anti gridlock law code#
Now, if it is a picture that was taken by Parking Enforcement, and although this is a moving violation, the vehicle code actually counts it as a parking violation, and it does indeed fit under the provisions where 40202(d) would apply:Ĥ0202(d) If, during the issuance of a notice of parking violation, without regard to whether the vehicle was initially attended or unattended, the vehicle is driven away prior to attaching the notice to the vehicle, the issuing officer shall file the notice with the processing agency. But do they have one at La Brea and Fountain as well? (The Google Street Image -Dated March 2011) shows they do but I don't ever remember seeing it). I also get a "red light camera alert" as I drive by Fairfax and Fountain (the blue poles). (Obviously these images might be outdated) I know that West Hollywood still has red light cameras at Fairfax and Santa Monica, as well as La Brea and Santa Monica. More importantly, does it look as if this was a picture taken by parking enforcement? Or is there anyway to tell if it was taken by an automated system?Īlso, at approximately what time of day/night did this grid-locking allegedly happen? Any idea?
#California anti gridlock law license#
The other page is a b/w scan of my car at the intersection with close-up of license plate.īut does the picture show you physically in the intersection (?brake lights on?)? Or are you simply driving through? The back is a Declaration Of Non-Ownership. With that being said, does it say to " contact the court" or does it say " Do Not Contact the Court"? The risk is, if you get a hard headed judge who wants to enforce it, or one who won't dismiss at the arraignment or one who has no clue! So there are risks involved and I don't know if you want to take them. And like I said, it would be one I would challenge rather than ignore. This is pretty simple, basic and should result in a dismissal at the arraignment. There are no other California Vehicle Code provisions that I know of to enforce any other violations via photographic evidence!Īnd since I cannot find 22526 listed there, that citation is invalid and must be dismissed! (Fact is, it shouldn't even be filed in court - so I suspect this maybe a fishing expedition). Preparation and delivery of a notice to appear pursuant to this section is not an arrest. (a) Whenever a written notice to appear has been issued by a peace officer or by a qualified employee of a law enforcement agency on a form approved by the Judicial Council for an alleged violation of Section 22451, or, based on an alleged violation of Section 21453, 21455, or 22101 recorded by an automated enforcement system pursuant to Section 21455.5 or 22451, and delivered by mail within 15 days of the alleged violation to the current address of the registered owner of the vehicle on file with the department, with a certificate of mailing obtained as evidence of service, an exact and legible duplicate copy of the notice when filed with the magistrate shall constitute a complaint to which the defendant may enter a plea. VC Section 22526 Entering Intersection Rail Crossing or Marked CrosswalkĤ0518. There is no reason to believe my car could not proceed through the intersection. I don't have much faith in fighting tickets here. Any advice? I would love to ignore this and move on. My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: California
#California anti gridlock law driver#
(a) Notwithstanding any official traffic control signal indication to proceed, a driver of a vehicle shall not enter an intersection or marked crosswalk unless there is sufficient space on the other side of the intersection or marked crosswalk to accommodate the vehicle driven without obstructing the through passage of vehicles from either side. VC Section 22526 Entering Intersection Rail Crossing or Marked CrosswalkĢ2526. The street continues for a a couple hundred yards, wide open, with my car stuck behind him. The car in front of my car is shown, stopped, with brake lights, for no reason. The red light camera warning sign is about 95% obscured by a tree
The photograph shows the back of my car, no driver This is different and I can't find any information on a similar instance.
As long as you don't ever contact them, it goes away. As I understand it, the best way to fight a red light ticket here is to ignore it, ignore the warnings, ignore the collections calls, and then it goes to Los Angeles Superior Court where they refuse to enforce the ticket and bury it. West Hollywood sent me a gridlock "parking citation" from a red light camera.
My question involves a traffic citation from the state of: California
0 kommentar(er)
